In article news:, John Fryatt
wrote:
> So, what resolution would be best for a 15.4 portable screen?
Best?
It depends on how/where you want to use it, and on your eyesight.
The cheap ones are mostly around 1200x800, some are 1440x900, the good ones
are mostly 1680x1050.
> However, I see lots of remarks from people saying that higher resoltuion
> is better. But doesnt his make everything smaller on screen and harder
> to see properly?
Yes, but it also means that there is more information displayed on-screen
at once, which is often more useful. You make your own compromises.
My choice would be a smaller screen -- 14 NON-wide -- for portability,
with as high a resolution as I felt I could comfortably see. My thinkpad
has 1400x1050; yes, everything is rather small, but I couldnt read any
screen without my reading glasses and with them the thinkpad is fine.
> I know you can scale fonts but I already do this up to the standard
> bigger option on my 24.
Scaled-up fonts on a screen with fine resolution may be easier to read than
non-scaled-up fonts on a screen with coarser resolution -- especially if
the fonts are anti-aliased (and it is done well).
> The only other point that occurs to me is that laptop screens are
> generally used closer to the face than desktop monitors, so does that
> compensate for the smaller text, icons, etc?
Not if youre long-sighted! Otherwise, yes; of course.
Screens are very personal things, the only good way to choose is to try a
few.
Cheers,
Daniel.